A prime example of Dicken's most excellent prose. Mind you, there's some difficult going for the modern reader, especially in the first part of the book. Convolutions of word order is Dickens fame; to boldly split infinitives, his game. Some of his sentences are virtually indecipherable. In one of the first scenes for example, at the Cathedral Close, given his reference to the habits of crows, it becomes a bit of a puzzle to determine how many people are involved in that dialog. Is it two? Three? Four? The naming of characters is another of Dicken's idiosyncrasies. But in a mystery novel, that can provide some clues. Drood for example probably refers to "Druid"; Rosa Budd, pretty obvious; Mr Crisparkle, a pleasant, sparkly-eyed fellow; the Landless twins, they really are quite poor, literally landless; Princess Puffer, another obvious one; Mr Grewgious, a gregarious sort; Mrs. Billickin , a contrary sort; Mr Tartar, seafarer; Mr. Honeythunder, well meaning bully. The list goes on, every character's name seems to be important in some way to the plot. My favorite minor character is Mr. Bazzard. He's seems to be an accident waiting to happen. A hazard, but in a comical sense. He's introduced in chapter 11, and if you decide to give up on the book early on b/c it seems a little too dense, be sure to at least read chapter 11. It's a hoot. And if you get that far you might as well read further on, there's some gems, plus the plot & language is more linear and dialog more spirited in the last half. Dick Datchery's unusual use of language for example: "I'm looking for lodging. Do you have something catherdrally?" ... lol .. If you're able to tolerate some archaic language, very much recommended. Be sure to have a good dictionary on hand.
I really enjoy Dickens' later works when they became darker and he came under the influence of mystery writers (like Wilkie Collins). This had the potential to be (in my mind) one of Dickens' best if not the best novels. It is very dark and brooding from the get-go and the mysterious death of Edwin Drood is not long in coming and with a host of characters who could be legitimate suspects. It's hard to find the motivation to pick up a book when you know it ends in the middle of things with nothing resolved. For a long time I asked myself, 'why bother?' Eventually I did pick it up after I'd made my way through Dickens but craved more...even if it meant an unfinished work. If you liked Bleak House and Our Mutual Friend you'll like this. If you're more into the humorous or picaersque early Dickens (Pickwick Papers, Martin Chuzzlewit, Old Curiosity Shop) you might not get into this. Read it for Dickens more than for the story. Or maybe you'd like to join the still vigorous debate over theories over who dunnit.
I tried very hard to like this & to finish it. Alas, I did not.
Charles Dickens' final, unfinished novel is considered one of his darkest works. Presciently, depicting what modern psychologists might now describe as a manic obsession, Dickens' creation, John Jasper is chillingly evil. His secret life as an opium addict is completely at odds with the daytime persona he presents as choirmaster in the fictitious town of Cloisterham. His brooding fascination with Rosa Bud, betrothed to his cheery, unsuspecting and hopelessly naïve nephew, Edwin Drood is creepy and repugnant and compels him to commit a horrible crime.
Lamentably unfinished and written in installments, The Mystery of Edwin Drood was way ahead of its time – foreshadowing and modeling the great psychological thrillers of the 20th century. That Dickens' characterizations remain fresh and wholly recognizable with their all too human frailties is evident in modern day presentations of this work – both in theatre and television.
Edwin Drood is Dickens's last novel. It is about a young man who mysteriously disappears and the resulting search for him. The best and worst part about this novel is that it has no ending: Dickens died before he finished it. So the reader never finds out what happened to poor Mr. Drood. This makes the novel a true mystery and allows the readers to form their own theories. It also makes the novel incredibly annoying if you're someone who likes to know things for certain. There is a theory out there (based off of a letter Dickens wrote to a friend explaining a new plot that he was thinking about), but there's no definitive answer. However, the parts of the book that made it to paper are fantastic. The writing is wonderful, the characters are very interesting, and the atmosphere is intoxicating. One of the most amazing things about the narrative is Dickens's ability to make a cathedral a constant, brooding presence, even chapters after he last mentions it. Edwin Drood is also a great character and very amusing. The novel is full of suspicious characters, any one of whom could have done Drood in. Or maybe Drood's still alive? We'll never know; however, despite the lack of closure, this novel is definitely worth a read.
There are no ages for this title yet.
There are no summaries for this title yet.
There are no notices for this title yet.
There are no quotes for this title yet.
View originally-listed edition
Report edition-matching error